Few of us set out to discriminate, yet without blinding, when choosing among job candidates or handing down prison time, our decisions are often biased.

In this Forbes article, I argue that Forensic Science needs to change and must be valid, reliable, and independent for justice to be realized.

Financial incentives can be a factor in pandemic policy decisions—albeit frequently at a subconscious and unintentional level.

The pandemic has transformed the way we work allowing employees to balance their jobs with their family care responsibilities and public health requirements.

Concerns continue to mount over the increasing public skepticism, apathy, and even hostility to the most promising solutions to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic: vaccines.

Movies and TV shows depict dazzling uses of forensic sciences in the courts, but reality itself falls far behind and countless miscarriages of justice are the result of bad science.

Loyalty is often seen as a trait that prompts us to be better people, however in certain circumstances loyalty can have the opposite effect and increase unethical behavior.

Misinformation regarding health matters is not new, but social media has certainly exacerbated the problem.

Stepping out of 2020 and into 2021, I wrote this Forbes article to reflect on a year that for many of us saw our lives mutated into socially distanced shadows of what were before, and how finding some meaning in that experience can equip us with a clearer sense of self and purpose for the new year ahead.

When my doctor ordered a CT scan that I didn’t need, I found myself in an uncomfortable position. Even though, as a physician myself, I knew that it was unnecessary, as a patient, I still felt compelled to comply.

There is a mis-perception that forensic science is flawless but miscarriages of justice caused as a result of bad science are not uncommon.